MIS 650 Project Seminar
Student's Self-Evaluation Form
(for evaluating the project report)
Category | Max | Actual | Comment(s) | ||||
Content (max 80 points) | |||||||
Method adheres to standards for the methodology chosen | 20 | ||||||
Arguments make sense | 20 | ||||||
Product is valid or useful | 20 | ||||||
Report or product represents an innovation or contribution | 20 | ||||||
Total for Content |
|
||||||
Presentation (max 20 points) | |||||||
Style is appropriate for project | 5 | ||||||
Writing meets graduate level standards for grammar, spelling, punctuation, usage | 5 | ||||||
Format is professional | 5 | ||||||
Report keeps interest high | 5 | ||||||
Total for Presentation |
|
||||||
Other Evaluation Responses | Mark appropriate boxes with "X" Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree |
||||||
My supervisor found it easy to work with me in terms of meetings, reporting | |||||||
The project was appropriate for this my level of preparation | |||||||
The project has promise and could be continued by me or another student | |||||||
The project required a lot of work on my part | |||||||
The project as executed was exactly the same as the project described in the proposal | |||||||
Additional Comments
|